Sunday, March 9, 2014

Open Prompts Partie Deux

For this post, I chose the 2008 prompt:
In a literary work, a minor character, often known as a foil, possesses traits that emphasize, by contrast or comparison, the distinctive characteristics and qualities of the main character. For example, the ideas or behavior of a minor character might be used to highlight the weaknesses or strengths of the main character. Choose a novel or play in which a minor character serves as a foil for the main character. Then write an essay in which you analyze how the relation between the minor character and the major character illuminates the meaning of the work.

 In Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman, Charley serves as a foil to the protagonist, Willy Loman. Charley's business and parental successes contrast with Willy's shortcomings in life, yet his ultimate respect for Willy serves to highlight Miller's ultimate message of the inestimable price of one's own values.

One of the most prominent similarities between Charley and Willy is their parenthood; both of them are fathers, and they have sons of the same age, Bernard and Biff, respectively. This trait provides for a deep contrast, however, as their parenting styles and their sons' outcomes differ vastly. Willy takes a deep interest in Biff and is continually trying to mold him into the perfect child. Charley, on the other hand, leaves Bernard alone and lets him become the person he chooses to be. Ironically, by investing himself so deeply in Biff, Willy generates a dependence in Biff that leads to his downfall, whereas Bernard is able to pursue a successful career as a lawyer with his father's minimal involvement. Through this contrast, Miller shows how Willy's attempt to force his own ideas of success upon Biff traps his son into a confused idolatry, which prevents him from going forward in life. It is only when Willy dies, providing the ultimate detachment from his son, that Biff is finally able to move beyond the values of his father and try and find his own values. In this way, Miller tries to convince the reader that one should always strive to find their own path, as opposed to living in the images of society or someone else's value of success.

Charley and Willy are also involved in business in some fashion. However, Charley leads a rich, financially secure life, whereas Willy continues to struggle to earn money to support his family. Despite Willy's lower income, Charley still carries a great admiration for Willy and his inability to give up hope. Even after his ultimate act of desperation, his suicide, Charley maintains that Willy's unending hope of a successful Biff and happy home life were what truly defined him. Even if he was a salesman, Willy's spirit could easily match that of his successful brother. Through their economic and moral differences, Miller points out that a person's true value lies in their character. Even if Charley is wealthier and has a more successful son, it is Willy who truly stands out as a result of his inability to ever give up on his dreams or values, even when Biff loses faith.

Within Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman, Charley serves as a foil to the character of Willy Loman with special regards to his parenting and wealth. Through their contrasting relationship, Miller highlights the ultimate value of a person's own self-esteem as opposed to societal measures of success and wealth.

3 comments:

  1. Abhijit,

    Charley and Willy are such great examples of foils of each other! The more I read the more I realized how opposite they are. Especially with parenting styles. I guess it's pretty obvious that Charley's parenting style worked out better. It also seems like Charley was overall happier. This is a pretty well-written and organized essay. I think by the time we write one more and prepare for the AP you will be able to write an awesome one! Overall, nice job:)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Abhijit,

    I was surprised that you used Charley and Willy as foils for each other as I always felt that it was Biff and Bernard who serve as the more prominent foils of the play, as they are the end result, whereas Willy and Charley are more of the “cause” and the beginning. Something I noticed in your essay, and something I find myself slipping into sometimes is that you often state a fact and then say “whereas…” to show the opposite without really going to full length to tie the two ideas together, which is probably the difference between just pointing out things that happen in literature and showing how they relate to the overall message. I think you could have structured your essay in a more standardized way as well, but the way you did it worked out just as well so I suppose it doesn’t matter since you still got to the meat of your argument. Good job overall!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Abhijit,
    This is a great essay! I think Charley and Willy as foils is definitely the less obvious choice, but I think you did a great job explaining this in your essay and I am totally convinced after reading it. I like how you addressed the fact that they are similar because they both have sons, but then you explained in great detail how this similar trait is one of the most clear examples of hour they are foils. I think you also did a good job of saying how their relationship added to the overall meaning of the book. I think, with the amount of time you were given kept in mind, you did a great job with this essay.

    ReplyDelete